Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Product Review: Asolo Men's TPS 520 GTX Boot

So for our little 4 day excursion into Peru's Lares Valley, I decided to get myself a serious pair of hiking boots. Even though we would only be carrying daypacks, I needed a boot that could support my weak ankles, propel me up steep trails to 14,000 feet and withstand some extreme scree surfing. After months of research I decided on the Asolo TPS 520 GTX.

At first glance these boots are as attractive as they are formidable. Full-grain leather uppers with superior ankle supports, Vibram insoles and dual density soles at a total weight of almost 3.5 lbs. Putting them on felt like slipping into a pair of old sneakers.

Break-in was done along the Appalachian Trail at High Point, NJ and Delaware Water Gap trails. While not always the steepest of trails, they are known to be rocky and can put some serious wear on the best of boots. There is a stiffness in the shank of these boots that does not go away with break-in. Which is great with highly technical trails with heavy loads but makes for less comfort on the typical backpacking route. I would also recommend that, if you plan on wearing thick socks or have anything but the narrowest of feed, to get the wide cut version. Asolo by design seems to cut their boots narrow with a low volume toe box so the extra width will add to your comfort. All told, between training with a heavy pack through the trip I logged about 200 miles in these boots. To date it the mileage is approaching 350.

After continuing to use these boots throughout training and the trip, I can say that these boot performed superbly. They stood up to harsh Andean conditions and showed little signs of wear after 40 hard fought miles. My feet stayed dry in stream crossings (no gaiters, but the streams did not come over the boots). Minor point but if you bang your toes on alot of things like I do, then it would ahve been nice to have a higher toe guard as the leather takes a beating on rocks.

Overall, I would highly recommend for advanced hikes with medium to heavy pack loads. However, I would go with a boot with a bit more forgiveness in the mid-sole for less challenging hikes or treks where you are only required to carry a daypack.


Pros

- Top quality construction
- Excellent ankle support
- Rugged dual density soles hold up on rocks
- Effective waterproofing
- Seriously stiff mid-sole

Cons

- Price (Retail $215)
- Stiff midsole may not be to everyones liking
- Difficult to size due to narrow cut (particularly when your local store does not carry them)

Final Thought: World class boot for advanced hikes with moderate to heavy packs

Friday, July 13, 2007

Kalalau Permits - Easier Done than Said

Taking a breather from the "Peru Report" to fill everyone in on the Kalalau permit process. Check out the state-run web site for camping permits on the Kalalau Trail and you might get the feeling that there is no chance to obtain a permit for a date that you would consider traveling on. There is mention of applying for permits one year in advance and "walk-in only" pickup on the first day of issuance. Here's what we learned:

1. Ignore what the site says except for the costs and length of stay..they are accurate. Kalalau beach is always open but the other campsites (Hanakapi'ai and Hanakoa) are closed and re-opened on no particular schedule.

2. Definately call the Hawaii Parks Department, the people are exceptionally nice and will mail you what you need. We called a few months before the dates we wanted and we got the dates in September we wanted. Yes there is a peak season in the summer months, but for most dates you will not have to apply a year in advance.

3. Once you pay for and sign the permits, be sure to send back the yellow copy as your permit is not valid until the signed version is on file.

4. Be an experienced hiker! This is a dicey trail and parts of it can wash out or streams can rise without warning..safety first!



Monday, July 9, 2007

7 Wonders of the World Revealed

7 Wonders Revealed

http://www.new7wonders.com/


Well the vote is in and the "new" 7 Wonders have been revealed. The voting just recently ended..although the top picks were announced in June. The new list being:


• The Great Wall of China

• Petra in Jordan

• Brazil's statue of Christ the Redeemer

• Peru's Machu Picchu

• Mexico's Chichen Itza pyramid

• The Colosseum in Rome

• India's Taj Mahal


Most of the list seems fair enough, however, (just a personal opinion here), Christ the Redeemer seems a bit out of place. It is a compelling site for sure but to rank it in the class of other architectural marvels of the ancient world seems a little misguided. Stonehenge or the Acropolis may have been a bit more fitting. What do you think? How many of these have YOU been to?


Upcoming Posts

I know these have been slow in coming but the real world gets in the way of writing (particularly when your not a writer to begin with!)

1. The rest of Peru (Urubamba and Lares Valley, Machu Picchu..complete with stunning pics). Check out the pics we just posted from Day 1..

2. Kalalau - yes, we're still going to do it..just got the permits!

3. Upcoming trips....Kili and Acongagua (we'll see about that one)

Sunday, July 8, 2007

Peru - Day 2 Touring the outskirts of Cusco

Still....acclimating..to the..altitude. Yes, Day 2 is all about relaxing and roaming around Cusco. Our guide company set up a comprehensive tour around the outskirts of town to see some of the Inca sites. It's our first glance at the scale at which the Inca's did things. So we piled into our private transport with our driver and guide (turns out we will come to rely on our driver more than we thought..sort of in a guardian angel sort of way!)

Sacsayhuamán

First stop was the The Fortress of Sacsayhuamán (located to the north of Cusco's main square, 1km away from the Church of San Critobal). Referred to as the Royal Houses of the Sun. The complex was for the Inca elite and was where they went to worship (you guessed it) the Sun. The fortress was set up like a small city, complete with running water. This is where you can get an up close view of the amazing stonework the Inca's were able to achieve without modern tools. Estimated weights of some of these stones is estimated between 90 and 125 metric tons. The sheer weight combined with the precision at which these stones were interlocked is in itself worth the trip to see this site. So much to say about this site so, instead of me rambling on, take a look at some of the pictures.

We spent about an hour here roaming the site with our knowledgeable guide. We are realizing at this point that booking a private trip was worth the extra few hundred bucks. The company we used (email us for the name) provided trained guides that spoke perfect english. It also allows you to move at your own pace and not be subject to 10 other people!

Q'enqo (Kenko)

Next stop is Q'enqo, an Inca temple which consists of two significant archaeological sites: Q'enqo Grande (closer to the road) and Q'enqo Chico (about 350 meters west of Grande, located on a hillside). Both are places of worship but their meaning has not been determined yet. Another example of fantastic stone work.Q'enqo Chico is a recent discovery and archaeological work is still going on. Our guide used to play "football" on the pitch that was above the site before it was found.

Facts of note are the amphitheater that surrounds the natural stone of Q'enqo Grande, the "ZigZag" Gutter (drainage for water/blood?). There is also an underground passage that is quite interesting with altars and niches carved into the stone (secret rituals??). Follow the slightly difficult staircase (or easy rock climb) to the top where rituals were performed at it's altar.

This turned out to be a quick stop but was well worth the time spent exploring. Again, your experience at any site is only as good as your tour guide. This site might have been a quick photo op of some more rocks had our guide not taken the time to explain its history and significance.

This short day ends with door to door service back at the hotel where we promptly headed out into the streets of Cusco to do some more shopping.


Meeting the Trek Guide

This evening we have a meeting with our trekking guide to go over trip details for our Urubamba/Lares Valley adventure. Our guide was an warm and endearing figure, however he tactfully made it clear that he would be in charge (this is a positive as long as it is communicated properly to the client). To hear his experiences over the years set us at ease that we had a seasoned veteran who was looking out for us. Outcome of our meeting:

Lesson 1 - Verify, verify verify. When booking through an outfit in the U.S., be sure that whichever company they "outsource" your trip to locally (and most will), knows everything you told the primary booking agency. Of particular note, communicate medical and dietary needs in writing and verbally to all agents and sub-contractors. We told the primary agent and assumed they would pass along the info, they did not. This was the the only major gaff by our booking company, but it's a big one.

Lesson 2 - Confirm every detail of trek itinerary. Our guide company told us 4-5 hours of hiking per day and to "bring a book!" for reading during down time. Our meeting in Cuzco revealed that we would be hiking between 6-9 hours per day at altitudes averaging 12,000 feet. No time (or desire) for reading...again, planning and coordination spectacular, minute details: a bit fuzzy.

Of interest: they say the coca tea helps you acclimate to the altitude and eases any stomach "issues" you may have with the food..we'll see...